State of West Bengal vs Taimur Sai alias Md. Taimur Ali Sai and 05 ors. Advocate - Swarup Hader — 675/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),121(2),132,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Bail

CNR: WBML010012692026

Case disposed

Filing Number

990/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

675/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

MANIKCHAWK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),121(2),132,3(5)
The West Bengal Gambling and Prize Competitions Act, 1957 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

Taimur Sai alias Md. Taimur Ali Sai and 05 ors. Advocate - Swarup Hader

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners accused of obstructing police during a gambling raid (Manikchak P.S. Case No. 91/2026). The court found that the injuries sustained were simple, three co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, and custodial interrogation was unwarranted given the nature of allegations. The petitioners were released on Rs. 8,000 bail each with sureties, directed to meet the investigating officer twice weekly until charge-sheet submission, and must surrender for regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners accused of obstructing police during a gambling raid (Manikchak P.S. Case No. 91/2026). The court found that the injuries sustained were simple, three co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, and custodial interrogation was unwarranted given the nature of allegations. The petitioners were released on Rs. 8,000 bail each with sureties, directed to meet the investigating officer twice weekly until charge-sheet submission, and must surrender for regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case