State of West Bengal vs Anamul Sk. alias Enamul Sekh alias China Advocate - Md. Nasimul Momin — 674/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),191(2),191(3),190,109,61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBML010012682026
Filing Number
989/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
674/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1963
Police Station
KALIACHAWK
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. Asit Baran Basu
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anamul Sk. alias Enamul Sekh alias China Advocate - Md. Nasimul Momin
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to Anamul Sk (alias Enamul Sekh/China) in a group clash case involving charges under BNS sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 61(2) and Arms Act provisions. The court found no overt act against the petitioner, no major injuries on record, and determined custodial interrogation unnecessary since similar co-accused were already granted anticipatory bail. Bail was set at Rs. 6,000 with two sureties of Rs. 3,000 each, with conditions including bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer and surrender for regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 674/2026
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to Anamul Sk (alias Enamul Sekh/China) in a group clash case involving charges under BNS sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 61(2) and Arms Act provisions. The court found no overt act against the petitioner, no major injuries on record, and determined custodial interrogation unnecessary since similar co-accused were already granted anticipatory bail. Bail was set at Rs. 6,000 with two sureties of Rs. 3,000 each, with conditions including bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer and surrender for regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts