State of West Bengal vs Nasrul Sk. and 04 ors. Advocate - Debanjan Dutta — 672/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),115(2),117(2)118(2),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010012662026

Filing Number

987/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

672/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

MALDA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),115(2),117(2)118(2),109(1),303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nasrul Sk. and 04 ors. Advocate - Debanjan Dutta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 672/2026 The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Nasrul Sk., Rojina Bibi, Rinki Khatun, Khairul Sk., and Arina Bibi) in a physical assault case filed by complainant Aklima Bibi. The court found insufficient material on record and the injury report did not warrant custodial interrogation. The accused were released on Rs. 6,000 bail each with sureties, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer until chargesheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 672/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 672/2026 The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Nasrul Sk., Rojina Bibi, Rinki Khatun, Khairul Sk., and Arina Bibi) in a physical assault case filed by complainant Aklima Bibi. The court found insufficient material on record and the injury report did not warrant custodial interrogation. The accused were released on Rs. 6,000 bail each with sureties, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer until chargesheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case