State of West Bengal vs Nayem Sk. Advocate - Mabud Ali — 670/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85/115(2),117(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010012632026

Filing Number

985/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

670/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

KALIACHAWK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85/115(2),117(2),109,3(5)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nayem Sk. Advocate - Mabud Ali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to accused Nayem Sk in a criminal case involving serious charges under sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of BNS. The court found that the accused had been in custody for one month with only general allegations against him, while co-accused persons were already enlarged on anticipatory bail, warranting his release on a bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer for two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to accused Nayem Sk in a criminal case involving serious charges under sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of BNS. The court found that the accused had been in custody for one month with only general allegations against him, while co-accused persons were already enlarged on anticipatory bail, warranting his release on a bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer for two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case