State of West Bengal vs Abdul Majed alias Majed Ali Advocate - Masidur Rahaman — 623/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010011862026

Filing Number

919/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

623/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

CHANCHAL

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 399,402

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Majed alias Majed Ali Advocate - Masidur Rahaman

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to Abdul Majed @ Majed Ali in a criminal case under IPC Sections 399/402. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation since the petitioner was merely named in the charge-sheet with no recovery from his possession, while co-accused were already enlarged on bail. The petitioner was ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, with one surety being local. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 623/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to Abdul Majed @ Majed Ali in a criminal case under IPC Sections 399/402. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation since the petitioner was merely named in the charge-sheet with no recovery from his possession, while co-accused were already enlarged on bail. The petitioner was ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, with one surety being local. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case