State of West Bengal vs Bibhisan Das and 8ors Advocate - Debanjan Dutta — 621/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,117(2). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010011832026

Filing Number

916/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

621/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

833

Police Station

MOTHABARI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,117(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bibhisan Das and 8ors Advocate - Debanjan Dutta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Malda partially allowed anticipatory bail applications in a physical assault and attempted murder case. Six of nine accused petitioners (Sudhir Das, Jishnu Das, Bulti Das, Shyamali Das, Sagari Das, and Raj Das) were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 7,000 bond each and directed to surrender for regular bail within a fortnight, while Tushar Das's bail was rejected due to his alleged involvement in causing severe injuries to the complainant's husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 621/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Malda partially allowed anticipatory bail applications in a physical assault and attempted murder case. Six of nine accused petitioners (Sudhir Das, Jishnu Das, Bulti Das, Shyamali Das, Sagari Das, and Raj Das) were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 7,000 bond each and directed to surrender for regular bail within a fortnight, while Tushar Das's bail was rejected due to his alleged involvement in causing severe injuries to the complainant's husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case