State of West Bengal vs Bibhisan Das Advocate - Debanjan Dutta — 620/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,325. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010011822026

Filing Number

915/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

620/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

267

Police Station

MOTHABARI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bibhisan Das Advocate - Debanjan Dutta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Malda partially granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Rita Das, Bulti Das, and Sagari Das) in a case involving charges of physical assault, outraging of modesty, and attempt to murder, finding insufficient grounds for their custodial interrogation. The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Nilima Mandal, Jishnu Das, and Sudhir Das, while also rejecting the applications of two other petitioners not pressed by their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Malda partially granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Rita Das, Bulti Das, and Sagari Das) in a case involving charges of physical assault, outraging of modesty, and attempt to murder, finding insufficient grounds for their custodial interrogation. The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Nilima Mandal, Jishnu Das, and Sudhir Das, while also rejecting the applications of two other petitioners not pressed by their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case