State of West Bengal vs Ujjal Biswas and 02 others Advocate - Chiranjit Das — 511/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,109,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBML010009732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
748/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
511/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
930
Police Station
GAZOLE
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Asit Baran Basu
Respondent(s)
Ujjal Biswas and 02 others Advocate - Chiranjit Das
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to three accused persons (Ujjal Biswas, Anay Biswas, and Prasenjit Biswas) under Section 483 of BNSS, primarily based on their prolonged detention since December 18, 2025, and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. Each accused must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each (one local), and is restricted from leaving local jurisdiction without I.O. permission and from threatening witnesses or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to three accused persons (Ujjal Biswas, Anay Biswas, and Prasenjit Biswas) under Section 483 of BNSS, primarily based on their prolonged detention since December 18, 2025, and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. Each accused must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each (one local), and is restricted from leaving local jurisdiction without I.O. permission and from threatening witnesses or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts