State of West Bengal vs Mohan Poddar and 05 others Advocate - Surajit Dutta — 293/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBML010005312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
415/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
293/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
ENGLISH BAZAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Asit Baran Basu
Respondent(s)
Mohan Poddar and 05 others Advocate - Surajit Dutta
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 10-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge of Malda granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Mohan Poddar, Mano Poddar, Sangita Poddar, Tuli Swarnakar, Bebi Swarnakar, and Jeet Poddar) in a case involving allegations of physical assault, wrongful restraint, and culpable homicide. The court found insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation based on witness statements and ordered their release on bail of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, directing them to seek regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Sessions Judge of Malda granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Mohan Poddar, Mano Poddar, Sangita Poddar, Tuli Swarnakar, Bebi Swarnakar, and Jeet Poddar) in a case involving allegations of physical assault, wrongful restraint, and culpable homicide. The court found insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation based on witness statements and ordered their release on bail of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, directing them to seek regular bail within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts