Abhijit Saha vs Rupa Poddar — 51/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 03rd June 2026.

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBML010004292025

Case disposed

Filing Number

102/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

51/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

4-ADJ III

Decision Date

03rd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Abhijit Saha

Adv. Aliul Hoque

Respondent(s)

Rupa Poddar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADJ III

03-06-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Ex parte hearing

02-01-2026

Ex parte hearing

02-09-2025

SR/AD/Appearence

Final Orders / Judgements

03-06-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: MAT Suit No. 51/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Malda granted Abhijit Saha's petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an ex parte basis. The respondent Rupa Poddar is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the petitioner may execute the decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner proved his case through uncontroverted evidence, including the marriage invitation card and legal notice sent to the respondent. The petitioner established that he and respondent were validly married in 2013, had a son together, and that the respondent voluntarily abandoned the matrimonial home on 23.07.2023 without reasonable cause and refused to return despite multiple attempts at reconciliation and a formal legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-01-2025
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MAT Suit No. 51/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Malda granted Abhijit Saha's petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an ex parte basis. The respondent Rupa Poddar is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the petitioner may execute the decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner proved his case through uncontroverted evidence, including the marriage invitation card and legal notice sent to the respondent. The petitioner established that he and respondent were validly married in 2013, had a son together, and that the respondent voluntarily abandoned the matrimonial home on 23.07.2023 without reasonable cause and refused to return despite multiple attempts at reconciliation and a formal legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case