Abhijit Saha vs Rupa Poddar — 51/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 03rd June 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBML010004292025
Filing Number
102/2025
Filing Date
22-01-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
4-ADJ III
Decision Date
03rd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abhijit Saha
Adv. Aliul Hoque
Respondent(s)
Rupa Poddar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ III
Disposed
Order
Ex parte hearing
Ex parte hearing
SR/AD/Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-05-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Ex parte hearing |
| 02-01-2026 | Ex parte hearing |
| 02-09-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MAT Suit No. 51/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Malda granted Abhijit Saha's petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an ex parte basis. The respondent Rupa Poddar is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the petitioner may execute the decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner proved his case through uncontroverted evidence, including the marriage invitation card and legal notice sent to the respondent. The petitioner established that he and respondent were validly married in 2013, had a son together, and that the respondent voluntarily abandoned the matrimonial home on 23.07.2023 without reasonable cause and refused to return despite multiple attempts at reconciliation and a formal legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MAT Suit No. 51/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Malda granted Abhijit Saha's petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an ex parte basis. The respondent Rupa Poddar is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the petitioner may execute the decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner proved his case through uncontroverted evidence, including the marriage invitation card and legal notice sent to the respondent. The petitioner established that he and respondent were validly married in 2013, had a son together, and that the respondent voluntarily abandoned the matrimonial home on 23.07.2023 without reasonable cause and refused to return despite multiple attempts at reconciliation and a formal legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts