SABDUL SK vs TARAPADA PRAMANIK — 137/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 01st October 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 01-Oct-2026 in 4 weeks

Title Suit

CNR: WBMD070001842026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

137/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Divn.Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad

Judge

4-Civil Judge Jr Div

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABDUL SK

    Adv. CHHAYA BISWAS ( SARKAR)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARAPADA PRAMANIK

  2. 2.GURUPADA PROMANIK

  3. 3.BIDDUT CHAND PRAMANIK

  4. 4.KAMALA RANJAN SARKAR

  5. 5.SHIB KUMAR PRAMANIK

  6. 6.NEJAMUDDIN SK

  7. 7.COLLECTOR OF MURSHIDABAD WEST BENGAL

  8. 8.Block Land and Land Reforms Office

Case History

  1. 01-Oct-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Title Suit 137/2026 Petitioner Sabdul SK's application for ad interim injunction to prevent defendants from occupying his property was rejected. The court found that while SK claimed 37 decimals of land through adverse possession, he failed to produce documentary evidence showing when he began adverse possession against the original owners. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court declined to grant interim relief. Case adjourned to 01.10.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Title Suit 137/2026 Petitioner Sabdul SK's application for ad interim injunction to prevent defendants from occupying his property was rejected. The court found that while SK claimed 37 decimals of land through adverse possession, he failed to produce documentary evidence showing when he began adverse possession against the original owners. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court declined to grant interim relief. Case adjourned to 01.10.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case