NIRODA MONDAL vs LALU MONDAL — 337/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Hearing Injunction. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Partition Suit
CNR: WBMD060003852023
Filing Number
683/2023
Filing Date
20-May-2023
Registration No
337/2023
Registration Date
20-May-2023
Court
Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Sr Div
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRODA MONDAL
Adv. Amit Sen
-
2.SANATAN MANDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALU MONDAL
-
2.BISHU MANDAL
-
3.HARIPADA MANDAL
-
4.KALABATI MANDAL
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing Injunction
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing Injunction
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
28-May-2025
Hearing Injunction
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
23-Dec-2024
Hearing Injunction
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
25-Jun-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
26-Feb-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
01-Jun-2023
OrderView PDF
Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
20-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 337/2023
Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts