NIRODA MONDAL vs LALU MONDAL — 337/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: HEARING INJUNCTION. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Partition Suit

CNR: WBMD060003852023

HEARING INJUNCTION

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

683/2023

Filing Date

20-05-2023

Registration No

337/2023

Registration Date

20-05-2023

Court

Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Sr Div

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

NIRODA MONDAL

Adv. Amit Sen

SANATAN MANDAL

Respondent(s)

LALU MONDAL

BISHU MANDAL

HARIPADA MANDAL

KALABATI MANDAL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Civil Judge Sr Div

13-03-2026

HEARING INJUNCTION

17-01-2026

HEARING INJUNCTION

28-05-2025

HEARING INJUNCTION

23-12-2024

HEARING INJUNCTION

25-06-2024

SR/AD/Appearence

Interim Orders

01-06-2023
Order

Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case