NIRODA MONDAL vs LALU MONDAL — 337/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: HEARING INJUNCTION. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Partition Suit
CNR: WBMD060003852023
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
683/2023
Filing Date
20-05-2023
Registration No
337/2023
Registration Date
20-05-2023
Court
Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Sr Div
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIRODA MONDAL
Adv. Amit Sen
SANATAN MANDAL
Respondent(s)
LALU MONDAL
BISHU MANDAL
HARIPADA MANDAL
KALABATI MANDAL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Sr Div
HEARING INJUNCTION
HEARING INJUNCTION
HEARING INJUNCTION
HEARING INJUNCTION
SR/AD/Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING INJUNCTION |
| 17-01-2026 | HEARING INJUNCTION |
| 28-05-2025 | HEARING INJUNCTION |
| 23-12-2024 | HEARING INJUNCTION |
| 25-06-2024 | SR/AD/Appearence |
Interim Orders
Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 337/2023 Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction directing both plaintiffs (Niroda Mondal and Sanatan Mandal) and defendant no. 1 (Lalu Mondal) to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed joint property until 26.02.2024. The court found the plaintiffs have a strong prima facie case of inherited ownership (1/6th shares) and that defendant no. 1's threatened unauthorized construction would cause irreparable harm. Notice was issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts