SENTU SK vs CHAINA BIBI — 1/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39RULE7. Status: Awaiting Commissioner039s Report. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Awaiting Commissioner039s Report Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Misc - Misc Case

CNR: WBMD060000912023

Filing Number

159/2023

Filing Date

04-Feb-2023

Registration No

1/2023

Registration Date

04-Feb-2023

Court

Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Sr Div

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39RULE7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SENTU SK

    Adv. CHHAYA BISWAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAINA BIBI

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Commissioner039s Report

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  3. 30-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Commissioner039s Report

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  4. 06-May-2025

    Awaiting Commissioner039s Report

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  5. 07-Sep-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case 1/2023 Summary: In this miscellaneous civil case (Order 39 Rule 2A, CPC), the court adjourned proceedings to the next date (06.05.2025). The petitioner appeared through counsel, but no written statement was received from respondent Chaina Bibi. The court directed the petitioner to serve the petition copy on the respondent through her advocate in the main suit, and warned that the case would be heard ex parte against the respondent if she failed to appear by the next date. The petition was subsequently served as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 07-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  7. 06-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  8. 05-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1/2023 Summary: In this miscellaneous civil case (Order 39 Rule 2A, CPC), the court adjourned proceedings to the next date (06.05.2025). The petitioner appeared through counsel, but no written statement was received from respondent Chaina Bibi. The court directed the petitioner to serve the petition copy on the respondent through her advocate in the main suit, and warned that the case would be heard ex parte against the respondent if she failed to appear by the next date. The petition was subsequently served as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case