ATIFA KHATUN ALIAS ATIFA BIBI vs RAJIFA BEGUM Advocate - Hasnain Reja — 15/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Hearing Injunction. Next hearing: 01st September 2026.

Hearing Injunction Next hearing 01-Sep-2026 this date has passed

Partition Suit

CNR: WBMD060000172026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Lalbagh Civil, Murshidabad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Sr Div

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATIFA KHATUN ALIAS ATIFA BIBI

    Adv. Kanchan Kumar Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIFA BEGUM Advocate - Hasnain Reja

  2. 2.RAJEKUL SK

  3. 3.ENAMUL HOQUE

  4. 4.COLLECTOR OF MURSHIDABADWEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. 01-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Hearing Injunction

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: In Partition Suit No. 15/2026, the court expedited the hearing of the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition upon request. The hearing date was advanced from 07.07.2026 to 14.05.2026, with the court finding adequate reason to accelerate proceedings after hearing both parties' advocates. The revised date was fixed in the presence of defendant No. 1's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing Injunction

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Putup

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr Div

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Partition Suit No. 15/2026, the court expedited the hearing of the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition upon request. The hearing date was advanced from 07.07.2026 to 14.05.2026, with the court finding adequate reason to accelerate proceedings after hearing both parties' advocates. The revised date was fixed in the presence of defendant No. 1's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case