Govt of W.B vs TOUFIK SK@MANIK — 487/2026
Case under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th May 2026.
GR-A - GR CJM Murshidabad
CNR: WBMD040018222026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
1821/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
487/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
Berhampore Criminal
Judge
2-JM I
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
404
Police Station
DOMKAL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt of W.B
Respondent(s)
TOUFIK SK@MANIK
SAHABUDDIN SK
NURNECHHA BIBI@NURUNNESA BIBI
HRIDAY SK@HEDAYET SK@TONIK
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JM I
Disposed
Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 487/2026 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Toufik Sk, Sahabuddin Sk, Nurechha Bibi, and Hriday Sk) of charges under BNS sections 85(2)/3(5) and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4. The complainant alleged the accused (her husband and in-laws) subjected her to continuous physical and mental torture over dowry demands of Rs. 50,000, culminating in assault on 14.04.2025. However, during trial, the complainant admitted the matter was amicably settled out of court and she had no allegations against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence of substantiated cruelty and held that matrimonial disputes cannot constitute cruelty without persistent or proximate torture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 487/2026 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Toufik Sk, Sahabuddin Sk, Nurechha Bibi, and Hriday Sk) of charges under BNS sections 85(2)/3(5) and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4. The complainant alleged the accused (her husband and in-laws) subjected her to continuous physical and mental torture over dowry demands of Rs. 50,000, culminating in assault on 14.04.2025. However, during trial, the complainant admitted the matter was amicably settled out of court and she had no allegations against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence of substantiated cruelty and held that matrimonial disputes cannot constitute cruelty without persistent or proximate torture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts