State of West Bengal vs Ajay Singh — 132/2024

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules Section 20b. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

N D P S Case - NDPS Case

CNR: WBMD010111352024

Evidence

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

9608/2024

Filing Date

10-12-2024

Registration No

132/2024

Registration Date

10-12-2024

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

6-Addl District and Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

FARAKKA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules Section 20b

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. AINUL HAQUE MONDAL

Respondent(s)

Ajay Singh

Vikesh Kumar Singh

Pappu Kumar Singh

Aadrsh Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Addl District and Sessions Judge

21-05-2026

Evidence

07-05-2026

Evidence

06-05-2026

Evidence

21-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-01-2025
Order
10-03-2025
Order
24-03-2025
Order
05-04-2025
Order
17-04-2025
Order
15-05-2025
Order
15-05-2025
Order
03-06-2025
Order
20-11-2025
Order
12-02-2026
Order
13-02-2026
Order
12-03-2026
Order
13-03-2026
Order
08-04-2026
Order
20-04-2026
Order
07-05-2026
Order
21-05-2026
Order

Case Adjourned In NDPS Case No. 132/2024, the Special Court adjourned the evidence hearing as no prosecution witnesses appeared despite summons being issued. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to ensure witness presence and fixed new dates (22.06.2026 and 23.06.2026) for production and evidence, emphasizing compliance with the High Court's directive to complete seizure witness testimony within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned In NDPS Case No. 132/2024, the Special Court adjourned the evidence hearing as no prosecution witnesses appeared despite summons being issued. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to ensure witness presence and fixed new dates (22.06.2026 and 23.06.2026) for production and evidence, emphasizing compliance with the High Court's directive to complete seizure witness testimony within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case