Joydeb Mistri vs State of West Bengal — 5550/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBMD010097252025
Filing Number
8321/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
5550/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
DOMKAL
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Joydeb Mistri
Adv. Allarakha Sk
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge dismissed Criminal Misc. case No.5550/2025 under Section 448 of BNSS due to the petitioner Joydeb Mistri's complete lack of engagement with the proceedings. Despite being directed to file a show-cause reply by December 22, 2025, the petitioner took no steps and failed to appear on repeated calls across multiple hearings. The court found the dismissal warranted as the petitioner's interest appeared to have "evaporated." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
31-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Show Cause
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Show Cause
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Show Cause
District Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Show Cause
District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
For Hearing On Admission
District Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5550/2025
The Sessions Judge dismissed Criminal Misc. case No.5550/2025 under Section 448 of BNSS due to the petitioner Joydeb Mistri's complete lack of engagement with the proceedings. Despite being directed to file a show-cause reply by December 22, 2025, the petitioner took no steps and failed to appear on repeated calls across multiple hearings. The court found the dismissal warranted as the petitioner's interest appeared to have "evaporated." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts