MOUMITA MONDAL vs NIL — 474/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBMD010094502025

Filing Number

1425/2025

Filing Date

12-Sep-2025

Registration No

474/2025

Registration Date

12-Sep-2025

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOUMITA MONDAL

    Adv. ABU SUFI MD. FIROJ

  2. 2.NIKHIL MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District Judge of Murshidabad granted a mutual consent divorce to petitioners Moumita Mondal and Nikhil Mondal under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the parties' marriage solemnized on 07.03.2019 had irretrievably broken down, they had lived separately since 15.01.2023, reconciliation was impossible, and both parties voluntarily consented to divorce without coercion or collusion. The marriage was dissolved effective 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 474/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Murshidabad granted a mutual consent divorce to petitioners Moumita Mondal and Nikhil Mondal under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the parties' marriage solemnized on 07.03.2019 had irretrievably broken down, they had lived separately since 15.01.2023, reconciliation was impossible, and both parties voluntarily consented to divorce without coercion or collusion. The marriage was dissolved effective 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case