KOtak MAhindra Bank of India vs Mr Aliul Seikh — 29/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: S/R and A/D. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Arbitration Execution
CNR: WBMD010066632024
Filing Number
990/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
29/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 09-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOtak MAhindra Bank of India
Adv. ANIMESH GUIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr Aliul Seikh
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: In Arbi.Exe. Case No. 29 of 2024 before the District Judge, Murshidabad, the case has been adjourned to 09.04.2026. The adjournment was granted because the Settlement Report/Additional Documents on Judgment Debtor No. 2 have not yet been received, and the Regular P.O. is occupied with Election Commission-related administrative matters per Supreme Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Steps
District Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Steps
District Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Steps
District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Jun-2025
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
07-May-2025
OrderView PDF
-
07-May-2025
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Steps
District Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
23-Dec-2024
S/R and A/D
District Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
OrderView PDF
-
05-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2024
Summary: In Arbi.Exe. Case No. 29 of 2024 before the District Judge, Murshidabad, the case has been adjourned to 09.04.2026. The adjournment was granted because the Settlement Report/Additional Documents on Judgment Debtor No. 2 have not yet been received, and the Regular P.O. is occupied with Election Commission-related administrative matters per Supreme Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts