HASIBUL MONDAL vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 1152/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010020742026

Filing Number

1784/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1152/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESS

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

NOWDA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HASIBUL MONDAL

    Adv. Dulal Mondal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1152/2026 The Sessions Judge of Murshidabad dismissed Hasibul Mondal's criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 483 of BNSS after the petitioner's advocate stated unwillingness to proceed. The court allowed the prayer and disposed of the case as not pressed, in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1152/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1152/2026 The Sessions Judge of Murshidabad dismissed Hasibul Mondal's criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 483 of BNSS after the petitioner's advocate stated unwillingness to proceed. The court allowed the prayer and disposed of the case as not pressed, in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case