Umar Faruk vs State of West Bengal — 1097/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010019742026

Filing Number

1696/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1097/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Umar Faruk

    Adv. Mosaraf Hossain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Umar Faruk and Angura Khatun under Section 482 BNSS as not maintainable. The court found that another identical anticipatory bail application for the same incident and police station case had already been filed and registered as Crl. Misc. case No.884/2026, making the instant application redundant and liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1097/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Umar Faruk and Angura Khatun under Section 482 BNSS as not maintainable. The court found that another identical anticipatory bail application for the same incident and police station case had already been filed and registered as Crl. Misc. case No.884/2026, making the instant application redundant and liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case