SADEK SK AND 6 OTHERS vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 1045/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010019192026

Filing Number

1642/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1045/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1002

Police Station

SHAMSHERGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADEK SK AND 6 OTHERS

    Adv. MD HASANUL ISLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the second anticipatory bail application filed by seven accused under Section 482 BNSS, finding it not maintainable since an identical application had already been rejected by the same court on 16.01.2026. The court disposed of the case, declining to entertain the duplicate petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1045/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad rejected the second anticipatory bail application filed by seven accused under Section 482 BNSS, finding it not maintainable since an identical application had already been rejected by the same court on 16.01.2026. The court disposed of the case, declining to entertain the duplicate petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case