Edrish Sk vs State of West Bengal — 962/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010017602026

Filing Number

1507/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

962/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Edrish Sk

    Adv. ABDUL BAQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted bail to three accused petitioners (Edrish Sk., Ibrahim Sk., and Suklal Mondal) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act sections 25/27/35. The court allowed their bail application considering that co-accused persons including the principal accused had already been granted bail, the petitioners surrendered voluntarily and have been in custody for considerable time, and further detention would serve no purpose. The accused were released on bail of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 962/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted bail to three accused petitioners (Edrish Sk., Ibrahim Sk., and Suklal Mondal) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act sections 25/27/35. The court allowed their bail application considering that co-accused persons including the principal accused had already been granted bail, the petitioners surrendered voluntarily and have been in custody for considerable time, and further detention would serve no purpose. The accused were released on bail of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case