Edrish Sk vs State of West Bengal — 962/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBMD010017602026
Filing Number
1507/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
962/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Edrish Sk
Adv. ABDUL BAQUI
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted bail to three accused petitioners (Edrish Sk., Ibrahim Sk., and Suklal Mondal) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act sections 25/27/35. The court allowed their bail application considering that co-accused persons including the principal accused had already been granted bail, the petitioners surrendered voluntarily and have been in custody for considerable time, and further detention would serve no purpose. The accused were released on bail of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted bail to three accused petitioners (Edrish Sk., Ibrahim Sk., and Suklal Mondal) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act sections 25/27/35. The court allowed their bail application considering that co-accused persons including the principal accused had already been granted bail, the petitioners surrendered voluntarily and have been in custody for considerable time, and further detention would serve no purpose. The accused were released on bail of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts