MUKTAR MONDAL vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 909/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBMD010016772026
Filing Number
1438/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
909/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 09-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKTAR MONDAL
Adv. Golam Kibriya Mondal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Court, Murshidabad rejected the bail application of accused Muktar Mandal under Section 483 of BNSS. After examining the FIR, witness statements, medical documents, and post-mortem report, the court found the nature of allegations and specific overt acts attributed to the accused warranted continued detention. The court found it was not a fit case for bail despite the charge sheet being filed and some co-accused receiving bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 909/2026
Summary: The Sessions Court, Murshidabad rejected the bail application of accused Muktar Mandal under Section 483 of BNSS. After examining the FIR, witness statements, medical documents, and post-mortem report, the court found the nature of allegations and specific overt acts attributed to the accused warranted continued detention. The court found it was not a fit case for bail despite the charge sheet being filed and some co-accused receiving bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts