RAHAMAT SK AND 2 OTHERS vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 747/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010013302026

Filing Number

1160/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

747/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHAMAT SK AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. Mosaraf Hossain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Rahamat Sk., Arju Sk., and Jisan Sk.) under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving simple injuries. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since medical documents confirmed only simple injuries and no prior bail applications existed on the same cause of action. The accused shall be released on bail upon furnishing Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 747/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Rahamat Sk., Arju Sk., and Jisan Sk.) under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving simple injuries. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since medical documents confirmed only simple injuries and no prior bail applications existed on the same cause of action. The accused shall be released on bail upon furnishing Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case