ALARUDDIN SK AND ONE OTHER vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 730/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010012782026

Filing Number

1112/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

730/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

BELDANGA

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALARUDDIN SK AND ONE OTHER

    Adv. Dulal Mondal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 730/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted anticipatory bail to Alaruddin Sk. and Asaruddin Sk. in a case involving charges under IPC sections 363/366/371/34 (kidnapping and abduction). The court found that custodial interrogation would serve no fruitful purpose since the chargesheet was submitted in 2010, no victim statement was recorded under CrPC 164, and no prior bail application on the same cause existed. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 730/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 730/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Murshidabad granted anticipatory bail to Alaruddin Sk. and Asaruddin Sk. in a case involving charges under IPC sections 363/366/371/34 (kidnapping and abduction). The court found that custodial interrogation would serve no fruitful purpose since the chargesheet was submitted in 2010, no victim statement was recorded under CrPC 164, and no prior bail application on the same cause existed. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case