SUKHCHAND SK AND 3 OTHERS vs State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP — 659/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed in Part on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBMD010011542026

Filing Number

1005/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

659/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Berhampore Civil

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed in Part

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

SAGARDIGHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHCHAND SK AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. TAlibul Islam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OR APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 659/2026 The court rejected anticipatory bail for accused petitioner No.1 (Sukchand Sk.), finding allegations of assault primarily against him based on FIR, witness statements, and medical evidence. However, it granted anticipatory bail to accused petitioners No.2, 3, and 4 (Anikul Sk., Sahabuddin Sk., and Golchehera Bibi), determining custodial interrogation unnecessary for investigation, requiring Rs.5,000 bail bonds with sureties if arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 659/2026 The court rejected anticipatory bail for accused petitioner No.1 (Sukchand Sk.), finding allegations of assault primarily against him based on FIR, witness statements, and medical evidence. However, it granted anticipatory bail to accused petitioners No.2, 3, and 4 (Anikul Sk., Sahabuddin Sk., and Golchehera Bibi), determining custodial interrogation unnecessary for investigation, requiring Rs.5,000 bail bonds with sureties if arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case