State Of West Bengal vs Rejina Oraon and Salim Islam Advocate - Kallol Kumar Das — 89/2024

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4(2)17/12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Sessions (POCSO)

CNR: WBJP090003062024

Filing Number

145/2024

Filing Date

12-Nov-2024

Registration No

89/2024

Registration Date

12-Nov-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Mal Bazar, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-Additional District Judge

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

647

Police Station

MALBAZAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4(2)17/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

    Adv. Apurba Ghsoh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rejina Oraon and Salim Islam Advocate - Kallol Kumar Das

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 89/2024 Summary: The bail application filed by accused Salim Islam in this POCSO case was rejected by the Special POCSO Court at Mal, Jalpaiguri on 16.02.2026. The court noted that the High Court had already denied Salim Islam's bail plea on 26.11.2025 and directed trial expedition. Considering medical reports and statements under section 183 BNSS, the trial court rejected the bail prayer. The matter was scheduled for consideration of charge at 2 pm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  12. 29-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  13. 29-Nov-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  16. 27-Aug-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  18. 05-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  19. 05-Jun-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  20. 05-May-2025

    OrderView PDF

  21. 05-May-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  23. 23-Apr-2025

    Production and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  25. 04-Apr-2025

    Production

    Additional District Judge

  26. 26-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  27. 26-Mar-2025

    Put Up

    Additional District Judge

  28. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    Additional District Judge

  29. 28-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

  30. 28-Feb-2025

    Put Up

    Additional District Judge

  31. 20-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

  32. 20-Jan-2025

    Production

    ADJ

  33. 18-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

  34. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  35. 09-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

  36. 09-Jan-2025

    Put Up

    ADJ

  37. 23-Dec-2024

    OrderView PDF

  38. 23-Dec-2024

    Production and report

    ADJ

  39. 10-Dec-2024

    Production and report

    ADJ

  40. 26-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 12-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 89/2024 Summary: The bail application filed by accused Salim Islam in this POCSO case was rejected by the Special POCSO Court at Mal, Jalpaiguri on 16.02.2026. The court noted that the High Court had already denied Salim Islam's bail plea on 26.11.2025 and directed trial expedition. Considering medical reports and statements under section 183 BNSS, the trial court rejected the bail prayer. The matter was scheduled for consideration of charge at 2 pm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case