State Of West Bengal vs Rajib Roy — 7/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69/108. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBJP090000182025

Filing Number

14/2025

Filing Date

28-Jan-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

28-Jan-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Mal Bazar, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-Additional District Judge

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

METELLI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69/108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

    Adv. Kallol Sen

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajib Roy

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  5. 11-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The case against accused Rajib Roy @ Arup Roy (SC 29 of 2025, Matelli PS Case No. 189/24) has been adjourned. The matter, which was scheduled for consideration of charge on 12.06.2025, has been postponed to 24.09.2025 for the accused's appearance (if on bail) and consideration of charge, as the Probation Officer was on casual leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 11-Jun-2025

    Appearnce and Charge

    Additional District Judge

  7. 14-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

  8. 14-Feb-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Additional District Judge

  9. 07-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

  10. 07-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 28-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case against accused Rajib Roy @ Arup Roy (SC 29 of 2025, Matelli PS Case No. 189/24) has been adjourned. The matter, which was scheduled for consideration of charge on 12.06.2025, has been postponed to 24.09.2025 for the accused's appearance (if on bail) and consideration of charge, as the Probation Officer was on casual leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case