SHASHI DAS MANDAL vs PINTU MANDAL — 293/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBJP050016342025

Filing Number

1107/2025

Filing Date

21-Aug-2025

Registration No

293/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Alipurduar

Judge

5-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 01-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHASHI DAS MANDAL

    Adv. SURAJIT SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PINTU MANDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The District Judge of Alipurduar granted a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Shashi Das (Mandal) and Sri Pintu Mandal solemnized on 15.12.2010. The court found that both parties mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage due to irreconcilable differences in social status, living standards, and culture, with no collusion involved. Custody of their 13-year-old son was awarded to the husband with maintenance obligations, and the divorce was decreed without any costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  5. 01-Sep-2025

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  6. 21-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 293/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Alipurduar granted a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Shashi Das (Mandal) and Sri Pintu Mandal solemnized on 15.12.2010. The court found that both parties mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage due to irreconcilable differences in social status, living standards, and culture, with no collusion involved. Custody of their 13-year-old son was awarded to the husband with maintenance obligations, and the divorce was decreed without any costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case