state of west bengal vs BHUPAL @PUNA CHHETERI — 166/2023
Case under 7.Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 12th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBJP050012002023
Filing Number
612/2023
Filing Date
27-06-2023
Registration No
166/2023
Registration Date
27-06-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipurduar
Judge
4-ADJ FTC II
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of west bengal
Adv. HUENGSANG TITUNG
Respondent(s)
BHUPAL @PUNA CHHETERI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ FTC II
Disposed
Judgement
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 26-02-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge, Alipurduar convicted Bhupal @ Puna Chhetri of murder under Section 302 IPC for brutally killing Lok Bahadur Rai in a premeditated, daylight attack. While the prosecution sought the death penalty, the court sentenced him to life imprisonment (till natural death) after applying the "Rarest of Rare" test and finding that mitigating circumstances—including no prior criminal record, good behavior, and possibility of reform—outweighed aggravating factors. The convict was additionally ordered to pay ₹50,000 fine (with one year additional imprisonment in default) and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the victim's family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge, Alipurduar convicted Bhupal @ Puna Chhetri of murder under Section 302 IPC for brutally killing Lok Bahadur Rai in a premeditated, daylight attack. While the prosecution sought the death penalty, the court sentenced him to life imprisonment (till natural death) after applying the "Rarest of Rare" test and finding that mitigating circumstances—including no prior criminal record, good behavior, and possibility of reform—outweighed aggravating factors. The convict was additionally ordered to pay ₹50,000 fine (with one year additional imprisonment in default) and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the victim's family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts