state of west bengal vs ASISH SARKAR@ASISH CHANDRA SARKAR — 256/2017
Case under 7.indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITED on 10th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBJP050006942017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
419/2017
Filing Date
23-06-2017
Registration No
256/2017
Registration Date
23-06-2017
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipurduar
Judge
2-ADJ FTC I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of west bengal
Respondent(s)
ASISH SARKAR@ASISH CHANDRA SARKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ FTC I
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-01-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 11-09-2025 | Evidence | |
| 07-08-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Court, Alipurduar acquitted Asish Sarkar and Pinu Sarkar of charges under Sections 363/366/376 IPC (kidnapping, procuring for illicit intercourse, and rape), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's criminal intent and that the victim's testimony contradicted the FIR allegations. The court noted crucial inconsistencies: while the FIR alleged the victim was taken to the accused's house and drugged, the victim herself testified in court that the accused merely assaulted her in a field during a scuffle, and she explicitly stated she had no allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Court, Alipurduar acquitted Asish Sarkar and Pinu Sarkar of charges under Sections 363/366/376 IPC (kidnapping, procuring for illicit intercourse, and rape), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's criminal intent and that the victim's testimony contradicted the FIR allegations. The court noted crucial inconsistencies: while the FIR alleged the victim was taken to the accused's house and drugged, the victim herself testified in court that the accused merely assaulted her in a field during a scuffle, and she explicitly stated she had no allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts