BASU TOPPO vs state of west bengal — 197/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBJP050004802026
Filing Number
356/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
197/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipurduar
Judge
5-District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
JAYGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASU TOPPO
Adv. KAUSHIK BANIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of west bengal
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
The District & Sessions Judge, Alipurduar granted bail to accused Basu Toppo in an attempted rape case (Section 64 BNS), finding that continued detention would not aid the investigation which is at a concluding phase. The court applied the principle that "bail is right and jail is an exception," considering his 23+ days in judicial custody and humanitarian aspects. Bail was set at Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, subject to weekly meetings with the Investigating Officer and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 197/2026
The District & Sessions Judge, Alipurduar granted bail to accused Basu Toppo in an attempted rape case (Section 64 BNS), finding that continued detention would not aid the investigation which is at a concluding phase. The court applied the principle that "bail is right and jail is an exception," considering his 23+ days in judicial custody and humanitarian aspects. Bail was set at Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, subject to weekly meetings with the Investigating Officer and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts