NAMITA SARKAR vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 2178/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),329(4),117(2),109,74,324(4),303(2). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010051562025

Filing Number

3259/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

2178/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),329(4),117(2),109,74,324(4),303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAMITA SARKAR

    Adv. DIPIKA BARMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Jalpaiguri extended the interim bail of the accused-petitioner for another term till the next hearing. The case has been adjourned to 09.04.2026 for further hearing, with the Court-Directed (C.D.) to be called, while the Public Prosecutor sought additional time to prepare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Hearing

    District Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Further Hearing

    District Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2178/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Jalpaiguri extended the interim bail of the accused-petitioner for another term till the next hearing. The case has been adjourned to 09.04.2026 for further hearing, with the Court-Directed (C.D.) to be called, while the Public Prosecutor sought additional time to prepare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case