SUMI MONDAL vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 399/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),304,308(2),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010011132026

Filing Number

671/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

399/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

BANARHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),304,308(2),351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMI MONDAL

    Adv. Subrata Karmakar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 399/2026 The Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri rejected Sumi Mondal's anticipatory bail application in connection with Banarhat P.S. Case No. 215/2025. The court found sufficient incriminating materials in the case diary showing the petitioner's involvement in serious offences, noted the petitioner's history as a habitual offender with another pending case, and observed that the chargesheet had been filed with the case ready for commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 399/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 399/2026 The Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri rejected Sumi Mondal's anticipatory bail application in connection with Banarhat P.S. Case No. 215/2025. The court found sufficient incriminating materials in the case diary showing the petitioner's involvement in serious offences, noted the petitioner's history as a habitual offender with another pending case, and observed that the chargesheet had been filed with the case ready for commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case