RAHAMAT ALI AND FIVE OTHERS vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 397/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,117(2),118(1),126(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBJP010011092026
Filing Number
667/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
397/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
DHUPGURI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHAMAT ALI AND FIVE OTHERS
Adv. Tapas Ghosh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal/OP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to two female accused-petitioners (Nurbanu Begam and Firoja Begam) in a case involving allegations of assault with an iron rod, finding no justification for custodial interrogation given the case-and-counter-case nature of the dispute over landed property and the investigation's early stage. The accused were released on Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, on conditions that they cooperate with investigation, avoid further disputes with complainant, and be questioned only in presence of a female police officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 397/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to two female accused-petitioners (Nurbanu Begam and Firoja Begam) in a case involving allegations of assault with an iron rod, finding no justification for custodial interrogation given the case-and-counter-case nature of the dispute over landed property and the investigation's early stage. The accused were released on Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, on conditions that they cooperate with investigation, avoid further disputes with complainant, and be questioned only in presence of a female police officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts