YUSUF ALI ALIAS IPE ALI AND OTHERS vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 350/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010009982026

Filing Number

596/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

350/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

DHUPGURI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,115(2),3(5),329(4),74,85

Petitioner(s)

1.YUSUF ALI ALIAS IPE ALI AND OTHERS

Adv. RUPA SHIL
2.MUNNI KHATUN ALIAS MUKSKAN KHATUN
3.MUSTAK ANSARI ALIAS MUSTAK
4.NURBANU BEGAM

Respondent(s)

1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
24-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Yusuf Ali, Munni Khatun, Mustak Ansari, and Nurbanu Begam) in a criminal case involving allegations under sections 109/115(2)/3(5)/329(4)/74/85 of BNS. The court found the allegations against the in-laws members were generalized, the victim's husband was not accused, and critical medical evidence supporting the charges was missing from the case file. Each petitioner was granted bail upon furnishing Rs.3,000 bond with two sureties of Rs.1,500 each, with conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
24-Mar-2026

Disposed

District Judge
16-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 350/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Yusuf Ali, Munni Khatun, Mustak Ansari, and Nurbanu Begam) in a criminal case involving allegations under sections 109/115(2)/3(5)/329(4)/74/85 of BNS. The court found the allegations against the in-laws members were generalized, the victim's husband was not accused, and critical medical evidence supporting the charges was missing from the case file. Each petitioner was granted bail upon furnishing Rs.3,000 bond with two sureties of Rs.1,500 each, with conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.