KOUSHIK MONDAL vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 345/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010009832026

Filing Number

590/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

BHORER ALO

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 117(2),109(1),126(2),115(2),324,3(5),308(2),324(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOUSHIK MONDAL

    Adv. Ashis Roy

  2. 2.MALAY MONDAL

  3. 3.AMAL HALDER

  4. 4.KALIPADA ROY

  5. 5.NIMAI MANDAL

  6. 6.MOHAN MALO ALIAS MANMOHAN MALO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to all six accused-petitioners (including Koushik Mondal, Malay Mondal, and Amal Haldar) in a case arising from a Holi festival dispute. The Sessions Judge found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the lack of recovery of stolen articles or weapons, and the injury report's insufficiency to support the charges. Each accused was granted bail on Rs.2,000 bond with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to all six accused-petitioners (including Koushik Mondal, Malay Mondal, and Amal Haldar) in a case arising from a Holi festival dispute. The Sessions Judge found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the lack of recovery of stolen articles or weapons, and the injury report's insufficiency to support the charges. Each accused was granted bail on Rs.2,000 bond with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case