SERAJUL HAQUE ALIAS SARAJUL HAQUE vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 272/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010007852026

Filing Number

466/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

449

Police Station

DHUPGURI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,109(1)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SERAJUL HAQUE ALIAS SARAJUL HAQUE

    Adv. Alpana Oraon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Jalpaiguri Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Serajul Haque, the father-in-law accused in a dowry harassment and poisoning case, finding weak evidence against him—the principal accused (his son) was already granted bail, the alleged poison bottle was not seized, and witness statements were merely general allegations of torture and money demands. The court directed his release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer and conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jalpaiguri Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Serajul Haque, the father-in-law accused in a dowry harassment and poisoning case, finding weak evidence against him—the principal accused (his son) was already granted bail, the alleged poison bottle was not seized, and witness statements were merely general allegations of torture and money demands. The court directed his release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, subject to weekly meetings with the investigating officer and conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case