MAMUN MD. ALIAS MD MAMUN vs State Of West Bengal/OP — 264/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,336(2),338,78,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBJP010007572026

Filing Number

455/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

264/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

NEW JALPAIGURI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,336(2),338,78,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMUN MD. ALIAS MD MAMUN

    Adv. Sampad Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal/OP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Mamun Md. in a case involving charges under sections 85/336(2)/338/78/351(2) of BNS, arising from a matrimonial dispute with his wife. The court found that the FIR was lodged during the pendency of matrimonial suits between the parties and granted bail with a bond of Rs. 2,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,000 each, on the condition that the accused shall not threaten or influence witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of Mamun Md. in a case involving charges under sections 85/336(2)/338/78/351(2) of BNS, arising from a matrimonial dispute with his wife. The court found that the FIR was lodged during the pendency of matrimonial suits between the parties and granted bail with a bond of Rs. 2,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,000 each, on the condition that the accused shall not threaten or influence witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case