LAXMI MODAK vs BINOD ORAON AND ANS — 78/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBJP010003362025

Filing Number

170/2025

Filing Date

22-Jan-2025

Registration No

78/2025

Registration Date

24-Jan-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri

Judge

4-ADJ III

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMI MODAK

    Adv. Sudipta Saha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BINOD ORAON AND ANS

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case MACC 78 of 2025 - Order No-07 (Dated 09.03.2026) The case has been adjourned to 27.04.2026 for the appearance of OP 2 (insurance). The petitioner filed a track report confirming that the item in dispute has already been delivered to OP 2. The court noted the Local Bar Association's resolution requesting no adverse order and that OP 1 appeared through counsel with written statement, while OP 2/insurance failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ III

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ III

  6. 24-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ III

  8. 30-Apr-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ III

  9. 06-Mar-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 06-Mar-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ III

  11. 31-Jan-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  12. 31-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 22-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 78/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case MACC 78 of 2025 - Order No-07 (Dated 09.03.2026) The case has been adjourned to 27.04.2026 for the appearance of OP 2 (insurance). The petitioner filed a track report confirming that the item in dispute has already been delivered to OP 2. The court noted the Local Bar Association's resolution requesting no adverse order and that OP 1 appeared through counsel with written statement, while OP 2/insurance failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case