SUDHIR KUMAR vs M/S ASHIANA GOODS PRIVATE LIMTED AND 02 ORS — 7/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O-43,R-2. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 25th August 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 25-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Misc. Appeal

CNR: WBHW090002462026

Filing Number

100/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, uluberia

Judge

2-ADJ 1St Court

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O-43,R-2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR KUMAR

    Adv. ALAKENDU PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S ASHIANA GOODS PRIVATE LIMTED AND 02 ORS

  2. 2.M/S MEGHMALA TIE UP LTD.

  3. 3.ANAM MOLLA

Case History

  1. 25-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary Misc. Appeal 07/26 | Additional District Judge, Uluberia, Howrah The appellant's petition for ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondent no. 3 from interfering with development work on the suit property was rejected ex-parte. The court upheld the trial court's status quo order (dated 05.02.2026) requiring both parties to maintain the existing state of the property until the injunction application is fully heard, finding this protective measure necessary to preserve the subject matter pending final adjudication. The case is adjourned to 25.08.2026 for receipt of trial court records and respondents' written submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1St Court

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1St Court

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1St Court

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Misc. Appeal 07/26 | Additional District Judge, Uluberia, Howrah The appellant's petition for ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondent no. 3 from interfering with development work on the suit property was rejected ex-parte. The court upheld the trial court's status quo order (dated 05.02.2026) requiring both parties to maintain the existing state of the property until the injunction application is fully heard, finding this protective measure necessary to preserve the subject matter pending final adjudication. The case is adjourned to 25.08.2026 for receipt of trial court records and respondents' written submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case