MD. ABU JHAFAR MALLICK vs MD. GIYASUDDIN AND 05 OTHERS — 185/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 16. Status: written. statement. Next hearing: 13th August 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBHW070002252025
Filing Number
375/2025
Filing Date
11-Dec-2025
Registration No
185/2025
Registration Date
11-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Judge, Jr. Divn. Amta, Howrah
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr Div
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. ABU JHAFAR MALLICK
Adv. BIPLAB DHARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MD. GIYASUDDIN AND 05 OTHERS
-
2.SAKENDER KHAN
-
3.SAHIDA BEGUM
-
4.JAHANARA BEGUM
-
5.MD. ABU BAKKAR MALLICK
-
6.MD. KUTUBUDDIN MALLICK
Case History
-
13-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
General OrderView PDF
Case Summary: TS-185/2025 The court rejected defendants 2, 3, and 5's petitions for time to file written statements, as the statutory filing period had expired. The suit will proceed ex parte against these defendants. The ad-interim injunction order was extended until the next hearing date of 13.08.2026, when ex parte injunction hearing and arguments will be heard regarding defendants 1, 4, and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
written. statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
13-Mar-2026
General OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
written. statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
15-Jan-2026
General OrderView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
written. statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-Dec-2025
ad-interim injunctionView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Injunction Order extended,W/O by defendant(s)
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 185/2025
Case Summary: TS-185/2025 The court rejected defendants 2, 3, and 5's petitions for time to file written statements, as the statutory filing period had expired. The suit will proceed ex parte against these defendants. The ad-interim injunction order was extended until the next hearing date of 13.08.2026, when ex parte injunction hearing and arguments will be heard regarding defendants 1, 4, and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts