STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs NAIM LASKAR — 3983/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448/427/323/325/379/506/34. Status: Er/Appearance. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBHW040093162016
Filing Number
11406/2016
Filing Date
06-Dec-2016
Registration No
3983/2016
Registration Date
06-Dec-2016
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah
Judge
3-Jm II
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
356
Police Station
PANCHLA
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAIM LASKAR
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
Case Adjourned to 12.08.2026 The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Howrah adjourned the case to 12.08.2026 for appearance of the accused. One accused appeared through hazira (authorization) while two accused filed time petitions. The adjournment was necessitated due to the presiding officer's deployment for Special Intensive Revision (SIR) work following a Supreme Court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
02-Jun-2025
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
17-Dec-2024
General OrdersView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
22-Feb-2024
General OrdersView PDF
-
22-Feb-2024
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
16-Jan-2024
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
15-Jan-2024
General OrdersView PDF
-
15-Jan-2024
Put Up
Jm II
-
20-Feb-2023
Er/Appearance
Jm II
-
31-Mar-2022
Execution of W.A/Wpa
Jm II
-
20-Aug-2021
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
03-Dec-2020
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
17-Mar-2020
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
16-May-2019
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
10-May-2018
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
04-Dec-2017
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
25-May-2017
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm II
-
07-Dec-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 3983/2016
Case Adjourned to 12.08.2026 The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Howrah adjourned the case to 12.08.2026 for appearance of the accused. One accused appeared through hazira (authorization) while two accused filed time petitions. The adjournment was necessitated due to the presiding officer's deployment for Special Intensive Revision (SIR) work following a Supreme Court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts