ASHA SHAW vs PHAGU SINGH AND TWO ORS — 336/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Dropped on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Mp - MISC PETITION

CNR: WBHW040067692025

Filing Number

6769/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

336/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dropped

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHA SHAW

    Adv. NEELAM KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PHAGU SINGH AND TWO ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah dismissed the miscellaneous case, finding that the dispute constitutes a breach of contract matter outside the court's criminal jurisdiction. The court determined no cognizable offense was made out, as the parties had a notarized agreement regarding payment installments, and the issue was purely contractual rather than criminal in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah dismissed the miscellaneous case, finding that the dispute constitutes a breach of contract matter outside the court's criminal jurisdiction. The court determined no cognizable offense was made out, as the parties had a notarized agreement regarding payment installments, and the issue was purely contractual rather than criminal in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case