PRABIR KUMAR DEY vs DOLA DEY ALIAS BANANI DEY AND TWO ORS — 907/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),324(2),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
Complaint Case
CNR: WBHW040060942025
Filing Number
6094/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
907/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah
Judge
2-Jm I
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABIR KUMAR DEY
Adv. SOURAV GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.DOLA DEY ALIAS BANANI DEY AND TWO ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Case 907/2025 Summary The Howrah court dismissed the complaint filed by Prabir Kumar Dey against his wife (Dola Dey), daughter, and son-in-law under Section 227 BNSS, finding the allegations of assault, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation were largely unsubstantiated and unsupported by independent evidence or medical documentation. The court determined the core dispute was matrimonial in nature stemming from long-standing family discord over money and property, noting the accused wife suffers from mental health issues requiring a sensitive approach rather than criminal prosecution. With no prima facie case established for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), and 351(2) BNSS, the complaint was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm I
-
13-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jm I
-
13-Feb-2026
Awaiting Report
Jm I
-
12-Dec-2025
General OrdersView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Report
Jm I
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 907/2025
Case 907/2025 Summary The Howrah court dismissed the complaint filed by Prabir Kumar Dey against his wife (Dola Dey), daughter, and son-in-law under Section 227 BNSS, finding the allegations of assault, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation were largely unsubstantiated and unsupported by independent evidence or medical documentation. The court determined the core dispute was matrimonial in nature stemming from long-standing family discord over money and property, noting the accused wife suffers from mental health issues requiring a sensitive approach rather than criminal prosecution. With no prima facie case established for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), and 351(2) BNSS, the complaint was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts