TASINA BEGUM vs SK. KARIM AND ORS — 660/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Misc Crl Case - Misc Criminal Case

CNR: WBHW040041222023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4121/2023

Filing Date

05-09-2023

Registration No

660/2023

Registration Date

05-09-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah

Judge

5-JM IV

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

TASINA BEGUM

Adv. LAKSHMAN CHANDRA BERA

Respondent(s)

SK. KARIM AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: 5-JM IV

13-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

25-02-2026

Order

06-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
FINAL ORDER

Summary The Howrah court granted ex parte relief to a woman who suffered severe domestic violence including physical assault, eye injuries, and facial paralysis at the hands of her husband and mother-in-law. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs. 4,000 monthly maintenance to the petitioner and Rs. 4,000 for their minor daughter, plus Rs. 50,000 compensation for emotional distress, finding the husband's uncontested absence and his documented income from his saree business sufficient to meet these obligations under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Howrah court granted ex parte relief to a woman who suffered severe domestic violence including physical assault, eye injuries, and facial paralysis at the hands of her husband and mother-in-law. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs. 4,000 monthly maintenance to the petitioner and Rs. 4,000 for their minor daughter, plus Rs. 50,000 compensation for emotional distress, finding the husband's uncontested absence and his documented income from his saree business sufficient to meet these obligations under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case