STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs UTTAM GHOSH @ BHUTO — 331/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,354,506. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Sep-2026

Gr Case

CNR: WBHW040009252018

Filing Number

925/2018

Filing Date

30-Jan-2018

Registration No

331/2018

Registration Date

30-Jan-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah

Judge

5-Jm IV

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

895

Police Station

DOMJUR

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,354,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTAM GHOSH @ BHUTO

Case History

  1. 10-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  3. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  4. 15-May-2025

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  5. 07-Aug-2024

    General OrdersView PDF

    In GR Case 6318 of 2016 (331 of 2018), the hearing scheduled for 07-08-2024 for evidence of the first prosecution witness (CSW-1) was adjourned as the witness failed to appear. The court issued a summon for CSW-1 and rescheduled the evidence hearing to 15-05-2025; the accused was present and the presiding officer was transferred during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence

  7. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  8. 31-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  9. 21-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  10. 21-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  11. 15-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Jm IV

  12. 03-Apr-2019

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm IV

  13. 25-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 30-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 331/2018

casestatus.in Summary

In GR Case 6318 of 2016 (331 of 2018), the hearing scheduled for 07-08-2024 for evidence of the first prosecution witness (CSW-1) was adjourned as the witness failed to appear. The court issued a summon for CSW-1 and rescheduled the evidence hearing to 15-05-2025; the accused was present and the presiding officer was transferred during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case