SUNIL KUMAR JANA AND 3 ORS vs GANESH CONSTRUCT AND BUILD PVT LTD AND 2 ORS — 208/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O41R1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
2.Misc. Appeal - Misc. Appeal
CNR: WBHW010057872025
Filing Number
3582/2025
Filing Date
12-Nov-2025
Registration No
208/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR JANA AND 3 ORS
Adv. SURESH CHANDRA DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.GANESH CONSTRUCT AND BUILD PVT LTD AND 2 ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The District Judge of Howrah allowed the appellants' appeal and set aside the trial court's order rejecting their request for temporary injunction. The court found the appellants made a prima facie case as lawful purchasers of the property via a 2000 deed, with the balance of convenience favoring them against the respondent company's alleged illegal and fraudulent subsequent sale in 2023. The interim injunction maintaining status quo is made absolute pending final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
General OrdersView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Adinterim Injunction Extension
District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
General OrdersView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Adinterim Injunction Extension
District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
General OrdersView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2025
Summary The District Judge of Howrah allowed the appellants' appeal and set aside the trial court's order rejecting their request for temporary injunction. The court found the appellants made a prima facie case as lawful purchasers of the property via a 2000 deed, with the balance of convenience favoring them against the respondent company's alleged illegal and fraudulent subsequent sale in 2023. The interim injunction maintaining status quo is made absolute pending final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts