ASHISH ANAND PODDAR vs MAUSAM KUMARI — 1215/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 25. Disposed: Contested--OTHERWISE on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

1.Matrimonial Suit - Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBHW010048812025

Filing Number

3110/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

1215/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

3-ADJ II

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--OTHERWISE

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH ANAND PODDAR

    Adv. KRISHNENDU GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAUSAM KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The court annulled the marriage between petitioner Ashish Anand Poddar and respondent Mausam Kumari under Section 25 of the Special Marriage Act, granting a decree of nullity. Both parties admitted that the marriage registered on 29-7-2025 was never consummated due to the respondent's wilful refusal to cohabit, and the court passed judgment on admission without requiring trial, citing Supreme Court precedent allowing such judgments at any stage based on clear admissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    General OrdersView PDF

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1215/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court annulled the marriage between petitioner Ashish Anand Poddar and respondent Mausam Kumari under Section 25 of the Special Marriage Act, granting a decree of nullity. Both parties admitted that the marriage registered on 29-7-2025 was never consummated due to the respondent's wilful refusal to cohabit, and the court passed judgment on admission without requiring trial, citing Supreme Court precedent allowing such judgments at any stage based on clear admissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case